swagneato:

lauralot89:

Fun fact about William Moulton Marston’s original Wonder Woman comics: Wonder Woman frequently brought women from Man’s World back to Paradise Island with her so that they could learn to fight like Amazons too.  Because in the original comics, the Amazon’s powers weren’t magical, just the result of a ton of training.  The idea was that literally any girl could be a Wonder Woman.

#how do i get kidnapped by Diana Prince to a Paradise Island of ladies to learn how to be a warrior (via @akumastrife)

(via alldogsarenonbinary)

beachdeath:

thenonbinaryspacegem:

insurrectionarycompassion:

internet-recluse:

meatthawsmoth:

image

She’s doing a great job

I mean getting the government running is a priority RN. I’m sure Dems will get to it in time

Like they got around to closing Gitmo right?

the bill wasnt to fund ICE by itself the bill was to FUND THE GOVERNMENT PERIOD. Like seriously voting no to stop funding the government specifically to stop ICE from being funded is 1. not actually going to deal with the problem of abolishing ICE and 2. Only will continue to harm those who are affected by the shutdown. Like those whos families need the welfare programs that the bill voted to fund??

 If we want to abolish ICE you dont do that by just saying ‘hi i vote to stop funding it’ once?? it takes LEGISLATION and WORK. Not just voting on one bill that isnt even focused on the issue at hand. 

this is such a bullshit outrage piece and yall keep falling for it. incredible. 

in 2019 we ARE reading articles and making sure we comprehend their contents and we are NOT posting headlines and reacting in outrage without even attempting to accrue further information

(via galaxysnail)

backgroundnewsies:

prsephonies:

im not INTERESTED anymore in seeing men’s perception of what female leisure time looks like, how we lounge around hairless and small and beautiful on our beds and couches in oversized shirts and lace underwear, unaware and unassuming and all the more beautiful for not Trying to be beautiful, i’m TIRED of it. even our most basic freedom of privacy, time alone with the self, has been butchered and ripped from us by the gaze of male photographers and artists

men’s perception of women lounging:

image

women actually lounging

image

(via galaxysnail)

cezarywho:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

thatpettyblackgirl:

This quote

image

We live in a simulation.

Those right-wing maniacs are really trying hard don’t they? Unable to win any argument - so all brain power focusing into making up fake content.

How low the Republicans go when they are scared of powerful women.

“Republican attempt to shame female politician with nude photoshop pictures debunked by foot fetishist using Wikifeet”

That’s a real thing that happened

That’s an actual news story that occured

What even is this planet

WikiWHAT?!

(via thewitchofthenorse)

botanyshitposts:

whitefriartuck:

vikingofficial:

pollymol:

bigwordsandsharpedges:

turtletot43:

harmonicakind:

i was about to joke about how my political stance is “end lawnmower culture” but then it occurred to me that i actually Am against lawns as suburban status symbols and wastes of land that Could be used to sustain native flora & fauna and grow food for people, but no, instead they are these huge useless swaths of land that need Constant maintenance, the process of which is not only destructive, but Incredibly Loud

You know that actually is the purpose of a lawn? They started as a trend of the French monarchy - the ones revolutionaries beheaded for being self indulgent assholes.

It exists purely as a status symbol that says, “I have land but I don’t have to use it for anything productive. I can invest time, money and resources in maintaining an entirely useless crop on land I’m not farming just because it looks pretty.”

Lawns offend me.

Why have that stunted golf course in front of your suburban house if you can’t even water it? Get one of these instead.

image
image
image
image

Unite Against the Lawn

Pro tiny house, anti grass lawn. Prioritize practicality.

This is actually really interesting because back in the 1950s and 60s in Australia when we started getting large waves of Southern European migrants one thing the Italians and others would often so is buy a little suburban home, then tear out the ornamental flower beds and lawn and useless trees and plant fruits, vegetables, grapes and even olives. It was considered completely scandalous by their Anglo-Saxon neighbours because lawn was considered an aspirational thing and the ideal was to go from not needing a kitchen garden and having an ornamental garden to show how well you were doing.

when i was at the san antonio botanical gardens last week they had a whole setup of tiny faux houses showing different potential layouts to alternate yards!! the focus of the exhibition was on replacing a lawn with other plants to conserve water (they partnered with the san antonio water system for this); lawns just…don’t do well in draught conditions, as you could probably guess. meanwhile native plants are VERY well adapted to the climate. from their website: 

WaterSaver Lane features six cottages that demonstrate different types of drought-tolerant landscaping, including one showing what not to plant! Find a variety of landscapes that minimize lawn and include more groundcover, perennial flowerbeds and herbs, native and adapted plants, and patio space.

here are a few of their examples (the exhibit has full mini yards to see but im pulling these pics off their website): 

cottage garden

image

spanish courtyard

image

hill country

image

they also have an adapted version of the traditional lawn. i know that this is a very lawn-abolitionist post, but in this particular hot take on the lawn discourse they’ve shown how replacing traditional lawn turf with low-water grass species, perennial shrubs, and shade trees can create the same kind of look in a more environmentally friendly manner:

image

(Source: selfiegoth)

skyakafreckles:

samthe-onion-nigga:

freewillandphysics:

teal-deer:

witchyroses:

art–felt:

I remember first learning that you can cry from any emotion, that emotions are chemical levels in your brain and your body is constantly trying to maintain equilibrium. so if one emotion sky rockets, that chemical becomes flagged and signals the tear duct to open as an exit to release that emotion packaged neatly within a tear. Everything made sense after learning that. That sudden stability of your emotions after crying. How crying is often accompanied by the inability to feel any other emotion in that precise moment. And it is especially beautiful knowing that it is even possible to experience so much beauty or love or happiness that your body literally can’t hold on to all of it. So what I’ve learned is that crying signifies that you are feeling as much as humanely possible and that is living to the fullest extent. So keep feeling and cry often and as much as needed

SHIT WHAT

Also let yourself cry. It really is a biochemical release valve to dump out all the chemicals that make you feel stuff.

I honestly think one reason men in western culture have so many problems is that we don’t let them cry, and literally their brains get stuffed with all this crap that doesn’t have a release valve. Men, please cry. You’ll feel better. It’s ok. You are not lesser for taking care of your health.

This is why tears from different emotions look different under an electron microscope. They’re literally made up of different things. 

Happy tears are structurally different than sad tears than angry tears than overwhelmed tears etc.

I looked it up, cuz that tidbit was dope to me and..

image

Never would have known

(via spellcollector)


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk